Sunday, December 6, 2015

The Shining Critique

Erik Leonhard
Professor Bomboy
Humanities
December 6, 2015
Critique of The Shining
            I have chosen to critique the movie The Shining. Stanley Kubrick directed The Shining, but Stephen King wrote the original story. I chose to critique the way that the music heightens emotions and tension throughout the film.
            Stanley Kubrick is known for the gentle release of his films, where he heavily relies on word of mouth popularity. However, this was not the case for The Shining. The films had a massive opening, but it did not gain proper recognition until years later. I would say that the main objective behind this movie was money, but Stanley Kubrick is known for his outstanding artistic composition of film as well.
            The film features a family of three main characters: Jack Torrance, Wendy Torrance, and Danny Torrance. Jack is a writer at heart, but decides to take a job at a hotel with a very violent past. Jack and his family move into the hotel as caretakers over the winter, and as time goes by, the isolation begins to play tricks on their minds. Eventually, Jack goes insane and embarks on a mission to kill his family. The film was constructed in such a way that there was never a dull moment, and there was never a time where you could predict what was going to happen next. The ending of the movie is very open-ended, and leaves you questioning the entire series of events. The music played an essential role in the film. The suspenseful events that occurred in the film would not have been nearly as successful if the music were to have been omitted.
            Music played an essential role in the film. It was utilized during scenes of terror and suspense to add more tension. One scene in particular that really utilized suspenseful music was the scene in which Wendy reads what Jack has been typing all of the months they were at the hotel. Wendy, armed with a baseball bat, slowly backs away from Jack as he is yelling at her. During this scene high pitched strings slowly build, and at the peak of the musical tension, Wendy hits Jack with the baseball bat causing him to fall down the stairs. Not only does the music add to the tension of the scene, but it also leaves the audience wondering what is going to happen. Most of the time, the music in the film indicates that something radical is about to occur, but on the transition to Tuesday, that was not the case. The musical buildup was similar to the sounds used in the baseball bat scene, but this build led to no significant occurrence. It slowly built up and made the audience think that something was about to happen, and then a black screen showed up indicating that the day was now Tuesday. I think the use of the false build was successful because it was used during a time in the movie where the backstory was being built. There really was not anything truly drawing the attention of the audience, so the musical buildup helped draw the audience back in during a more dry section of the movie. Similar string builds were used throughout the movie in the same way, but each build was slightly different. Some builds included drums and bells, while others were solely what sounded like string instruments.
            Overall I thought that the film was tremendous. Each actor was perfectly cast, especially Jack who was played by Jack Nicholson. Jack was a psychopath and Nicholson could not have portrayed the insanity any more perfectly. All of the horror in the film seemed superbly realistic because Nicholson's acting was so convincing. Watching his psychotic episodes really turned the film into an emotional experience that not too many other directors have achieved. The combination of Kubrick’s directing, Nicholson's acting, and the musical tension led to a film that will continue to be appreciated and analyzed for years to come.



Works Cited
The Shining. Dir. Stanley Kubrick. Film.

"The Shining." IMDb. IMDb.com. Web. 7 Dec. 2015.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Erik Leonhard
November 1, 2015
Professor Bomboy
HUM 101
Marxists Interpretation of "Mr. and Mrs. Andrews"
            Narrative paintings are paintings that tell a story with no words. A story that is for the most part unknown, expect by the artist who originally painted the painting. I chose the painting Mr. and Mrs. Andrews (1748-49) by Gainsborough. This particular painting could be perceived in a plethora of ways, but in this essay I will only be discussing my personal opinions of the painting through description, analyzation, interpretation, and judgment.
            The first part in my evaluation is the description through elements and principals. The lines in this painting are hard to pick out because everything seems to flow together in a pastel like manner, which creates a very smooth texture. The main lines in the painting are the lines of what looks like wheat. The wheat creates depth within the painting because the line of wheat seems to go back towards the vanishing point (if there was a solid vanishing point in this painting. The colors of this painting are fairly neutral, except for the two human subjects. This brings me to the focal point. The focal point of this painting is where the most color is; on the subjects. To me, both the male and the female subject could be drawn a little more proportionally. I feel like if the female were to stand up, she would be taller than the male subject, which would kind of destroy the message of the painting. This brings me perfectly into the next piece of my evaluation, which is the analyzation.
            When thinking about the analyzation of a painting, one must think of how the elements and principals combine to form a whole. The textures and colors of the two human subjects really emphasize their importance. The background of the painting (the landscape scenery) is pretty blurry and pastel like, which is very different than the two human subjects. The lighting contrast on the man and woman’s clothing is very crisp and more 'realistic' than the background completely drawing the viewers’ attention to them. The colors that both subjects are wearing are also very vibrant compared to the background, which further draws the viewer’s eye to them. The fact that Gainsborough emphasized the two human subjects leads into my interpretation of this painting.
            To interpret a painting, one must think about why the painter chose to arrange and construct the painting the way they did. Personally, I think this painting is nothing more than a family portrait. Little to Gainsborough's knowledge, he literally painted history. By accurately depicting the subjects’ normal dress, their dog, and the land behind them, he showed viewers now a days what life was like back then for people of their social stature. Both Mr. and Mrs. Andrews were real people and they are wearing what they normally would in their day and age. The Andrew's were members "...of the so-called landed gentry, meaning they were wealthy, often self-made, but didn't have peerage, or a noble blood line." (The Story of...) so I think that this further backs up the fact that this may have just been a simple family portrait. I think that the aim was to emphasize their wealth and status. The vibrancy of the clothing of the Andrews is a clear indicator that the painting was a focus of their status.
            This leaves one last question; did Gainsborough successfully communicate the idea he was trying to portray? I believe that Gainsborough did a fantastic job representing his purpose. Being a Marxist critique, I really don't think that Gainsborough could have done a better job. He did a superior job by representing their wealth a social status through many outlets. He emphasized this through their clothing, the position of Mr. Andrews compared to Mrs. Andrews, and also by the land depicted in the background. All of those aspects lead back to the wealth and status of the infamous couple. The clothing that is seen is in good condition, and it is not dirty at all. It is clothing of the high class. Mrs. Andrews is seated in a nice dress, showing that she has no need to work at all because she is financially secure. Mr. Andrews is holding a gun and being idealized by the dog off to his side. This shows that even Mr. Andrews does not need to work all of the time. He has plenty of down time to waltz through his massive property with his dog and hunt. The background itself also emphasized that they have wealth just by the sheer size of the land.
            In conclusion Gainsborough did a fantastic job with this painting form a Marxist viewpoint. He made it extremely obvious that the Andrews were wealthy people in a time where most were struggling. Every aspect of art from the lines, the textures, the contrast and the focal point, was completely on mark and could not have been more precise. Gainsborough succeeded with his purpose and made his point as clear as it could be.
           



Works Cited

"The Story of Mr. and Mrs. Andrews." Joshua Kennon. Web. 1 Nov. 2015.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Thomas_Gainsborough_-_Mr_and_Mrs_Andrews.jpg

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Erik Leonhard
Professor Bomboy
Humanities 101
September 12, 2015
From Greece to Carlisle
            The Greeks were the some of the first pioneers of architecture. Some of the most prominent styles of modern architecture originated from Greece. If you take a look around, buildings everywhere resemble structures that were built in and around 400 BC. In my hometown of Carlisle, many buildings stem from the designs of ancient Greek architects. One building in particular that really idealizes the style of the Greeks is Carlisle United Methodist Church, located in downtown Carlisle.
            Carlisle United Methodist Church took its name in 1897; it was not built on that date however ("Our Heritage"). The actual date of construction was not stated on the CUMC website. The church stands tall on the corner of 45 South West Street in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. CUMC is a conglomerate of churches. In the spring of 2013, three local churches banned together to form the Carlisle United Methodist Church. The three churches represented three traditions: "...Evangelical, Methodist, and United Brethren..." ("Our Heritage"). Every Sunday, people flock to CUMC to worship. The church also hosts food drives, houses the homeless, and much more. The building itself is a very large structure, and it would make the Greeks proud due to its Ionic construction.
            CUMC most resembles the Ionic order (Fiero 123). The Ionic order "...was developed in Ionia on the Aegean coast of Asia Minor in the mid-sixth century BC" ("Ionic Order"). The Ionic order can be seen in the architecture of "...some of the small temples on the Acropolis." in Greece (Fiero 123). The Ionic order has many different characteristics, and each one is found in the architecture of CUMC. There are four main columns supporting the original entrance of the building' each one tapering thinner as they rise. Sitting atop each column is a volute. If you follow the column to the bottom, each one sits on a base and stylobate. Above the columns there is a beautiful frieze and atop the frieze sits the pediment with a gable style roof.
            Out of the three orders, the Ionic order was chosen over the Doric order.  The Ionic order is modeled after female proportions as compared to the Doric male proportions. The female persona is much more loving and graceful, making it a far better choice classical order-wise. A church is a loving environment, which meshes perfectly with the female-esque, Ionic proportions. Not only is the overall design of the building amazing, but also when you look more deeply into the details, the architecture and design becomes even more powerful.
            The architecture of CUMC conveys a powerful message. The large columns, topped with volutes, signify the power of the church. When the Roman emperor Constantine the Great approved Christianity, churches grew more powerful, eventually turning into a theocracy in some parts of the world. I feel that the power of the church is represented very well through the tall, mighty columns. The volutes atop the columns also play a big part in the hidden meaning behind the architecture. The volutes resemble scrolls. The scroll is significant because in ancient times, religious text was written on scrolls.  CUMC also has a cupola on the roof as well. Cupolas are found throughout many Greek churches to this day (the example above is located in Megalochori, Santorini, Greece). The design of the building was perfectly planned to fit as a place of worship and religion.

            The Ionic style greatly enhanced the building's use. Nothing is very large in Carlisle and the CUMC is huge. If you were to walk down the sidewalks, CUMC is one building that would definitely stand out. As soon as you lay eyes on the building you can immediately tell that it is a church.
           
           



Works Cited
Fiero, Gloria K., The Human Tradition. 6th Ed. Vol.1. New York: McGraw-Hill,   2011.Print.
"Ionic Order." Ionic Order. Web. 12 Sept. 2015.
"Our Heritage." Carlisle United Methodist Church PA. Web. 12 Sept. 2015.

Photo Citations
"Church Cupolas in Megalochori Village near Vedema Resort | Sand In My Suitcase."            Sand In My Suitcase. Web. 12 Sept. 2015

"Three United Methodist Churches in Carlisle to Merge." The Sentinel. 4 Mar. 2012.   Web. 12 Sept. 2015.